« I'm not picky; let's be broad. | Main | Development: the oh-so-fine balancing act... »

October 07, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c15b253ef0120a622c0a2970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference We've got some cynical responses here, and I like it.:

Comments

JS

Just had to throw it out there :)

When asked what I'm studying, I give the exact title of the program (long winded as it may be) and then I specify my focus on humanitarian aid and health issues. I mean, "development" is so subjective...

Wag1

In reading your post, I do not understand why you consider defining "development" as being a bad thing. Part of the premise is to force us to think critically and analytically about a given concept. What is wrong with that? At the very least, it helps us explain to others what we are studying.

In terms of Stern students having to define "business", or Steinhardt students defining "education", they may not be. But, I certain that Stern students have to define/interpret subcategories of business such as: sales or marketing. This is comparable to us defining "development", which is a subcategory under the umbrella of public service/affairs.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment